Leopold Zima vs Ben Chetewy Ungar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zima vs Ungar analysis and find out who is favored!
Leopold Zima vs Ben Chetewy Ungar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zima has won 41.37% of points on his second serve, while Ungar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zima, in recent form, has won 45.18% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ungar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.44% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zima has saved 55.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ungar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zima has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 28/ 24), with Ungar winning 52% (W/L 13/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 59/ 57). Ungar has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 16/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 28/ 22), where as Ungar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52% of matches (W/L 13/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zima winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zima winning 2 and Ungar winning 0. The last match between Zima and Ungar was at the M15 Heraklion, 11-03-2024, Q2 round, Hard with Leopold Zima getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zima and Ungar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zima winning 0 times and Ungar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zima winning 0, and Ungar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zima has played against opponents with an average rank of 134.31 while Ungar has played against players with an average rank of 5.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zima has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ungar has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zima has converted 46.07% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ungar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zima 1 - 0 Ungar
Leopold Zima
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
895
Rank
774
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
Ben Chetewy Ungar
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
56% (156-125)
Career Total W/L
50% (18-18)
62% (16-10)
YTD W/L
54% (7-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Leopold Zima | Ben Chetewy Ungar |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Leopold Zima | Ben Chetewy Ungar |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 62% (16/10) | 54% (7/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 57% (34/26) | 50% (14/14) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (303/284) | 51% (130/124) |
Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 56% (5/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 50% (2/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.24 | 0 |
Aces Total | 70 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.12 | 0 |
DFs Total | 35 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 117.96 | 10.62 |
1st Serve % | 67% (640/954) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (450/640) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 43% (134/314) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (28/68) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 34% (306/897) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 64% (16/9) | 54% (7/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (16/26) | 54% (7/13) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (6/8) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 100% (6/6) |
1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 0% (6/0) |
1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 14% (7/1) |
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Leopold Zima
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Milos Karol
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ignacio Buse
Player
Leopold Zima
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Emanuele Turconi
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Ben Chetewy Ungar Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-7(1) 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H |
view more